How to Write More Effectively at Work: The Skills Nobody Taught You in School

Connect with us: SB Nation | Medium | Pexels | Morguefile | Elephant Journal

The email arrived at 4:47 PM on a Wednesday, and I knew immediately that someone's career was about to take a nosedive. Not because of what they'd done, but because of how they'd written about what they'd done.

Twenty-three years in corporate training, and I still see the same bloody mistakes over and over again. People who can solve complex problems, manage million-dollar budgets, and lead teams of fifty, but can't write a coherent email to save their professional lives.

Here's the thing nobody wants to admit: your writing skills are probably holding you back more than you realise.

The Real Cost of Poor Writing

I was working with a client in Melbourne last year – brilliant engineer, absolute wizard with technical solutions. But every proposal he submitted read like it was translated from English into English by someone who barely spoke either language. Three promotions passed him by before he finally asked why.

The answer was sitting in his sent folder.

Your writing doesn't just communicate information. It communicates competence. Every email you send, every report you submit, every proposal you craft is being judged not just on content, but on how well you can express that content.

And here's where most people get it wrong: they think good workplace writing means using bigger words and longer sentences.

Bollocks.

The Australian Advantage

We've got something here in Australia that gives us a natural edge in workplace communication. We don't bullshit around. We get to the point. We call a spade a spade, not "an earth-moving implement designed for manual excavation purposes."

But somehow, the moment we sit down to write a business document, we lose our minds.

I see it constantly in communication training sessions – people who speak clearly and directly suddenly start writing like they're trying to impress their Year 12 English teacher.

Stop it.

The Five-Minute Rule That Changed Everything

Here's something I learned from a newspaper editor in Brisbane who later moved into corporate communications. She had a rule: if you can't explain your main point to someone in five minutes of casual conversation, you can't write about it effectively either.

Most workplace writing fails because people start writing before they start thinking.

Before you touch that keyboard, spend five minutes talking through your message out loud. To yourself, to your coffee cup, to your confused-looking cat. Doesn't matter. Just speak it first.

You'll be amazed how much clearer your writing becomes when you start with clear thinking.

The Grammar Police Can Go Home

I'm going to say something that might upset the perfectionists reading this: grammar mistakes don't kill careers. Unclear communication does.

Yes, basic grammar matters. Yes, you should know the difference between "their," "there," and "they're." But if you're spending twenty minutes debating whether to use "who" or "whom" in an email about quarterly budgets, you're missing the point entirely.

Focus on clarity first. Polish later.

I once worked with a CEO who made grammar mistakes in every email he sent. Constantly mixed up apostrophes, split infinitives like he was paid by the violation. But his messages were so clear, so direct, so actionable that nobody cared about the grammar. They cared about the results.

Contrast that with another executive I knew who wrote grammatically perfect emails that nobody could understand. Guess which one got promoted?

The Power of the Delete Key

The best writing advice I ever received came from my first boss, a no-nonsense woman who ran a training company in Sydney. She told me: "Write everything you want to say, then delete half of it. Then delete half of what's left."

Seemed extreme at the time. Now I realise she was being conservative.

Most workplace writing contains about 60% unnecessary words. We hedge our bets with phrases like "I was wondering if perhaps you might consider the possibility of..." when we mean "Please consider..."

Cut the fat. Your readers will thank you.

Here's a practical exercise: take your last three emails and rewrite them using half the words. I guarantee they'll be clearer, more direct, and more persuasive.

The Subject Line Crisis

Can we talk about subject lines for a moment? Because what I see in most corporate inboxes is a travesty.

"Meeting" tells me nothing. "Update" tells me nothing. "Quick question" tells me nothing.

Your subject line should be a newspaper headline. It should tell the reader exactly what they're getting and why they should care.

Instead of "Meeting," try "Budget approval meeting rescheduled to Friday 2 PM." Instead of "Update," try "Project Delta completed two days ahead of schedule." Instead of "Quick question," try "Need your input on marketing strategy by Thursday."

See the difference? Your readers know immediately what's required of them.

The Template Trap

Every organisation has email templates. Standard responses for common situations. Approved language for official communications.

Use them as guidelines, not handcuffs.

I've seen people torture themselves trying to fit their message into a template that doesn't quite work. The template becomes more important than the communication. That's backwards thinking.

The professional development training I run often includes exercises where people have to communicate the same information using their natural voice versus corporate template language. The natural voice wins every time for clarity and impact.

Templates are tools, not rules.

The CC Field Disaster

While we're on the subject of email disasters, let's address the elephant in the room: CC abuse.

Stop CC'ing everyone you've ever met. Stop CC'ing people "just in case." Stop using CC as a political shield.

Every name in that CC field represents someone whose time you're claiming. Make sure you're worthy of that claim.

I worked with one team where the average email had fourteen people in CC. Fourteen! Most of them had no idea why they were included. They just knew they had to read it because their name was on it.

The productivity loss was staggering.

The Mobile Reality Check

Here's a statistic that should scare you: 67% of business emails are now opened on mobile devices first. That beautiful formatting you spent an hour perfecting? Gone. Those carefully crafted tables? Unreadable. Those elegant paragraph structures? Mangled.

Your writing needs to work on a phone screen.

That means shorter paragraphs. Bullet points instead of dense text blocks. Clear headings that work as scannable navigation.

If your email doesn't make sense on a phone, you've already lost most of your audience.

The Tone Minefield

Email tone is like a game of telephone played with dynamite. What sounds friendly in your head can read as sarcastic on screen. What feels appropriately formal to you might come across as cold and dismissive to your reader.

I've seen workplace relationships destroyed by misinterpreted email tone. Not because anyone meant harm, but because digital communication strips away all the contextual clues we rely on in face-to-face conversation.

When in doubt, err on the side of warmth. Add an extra "please" or "thank you." Use someone's name. Acknowledge their time and effort.

These small touches don't make you weak. They make you human.

The Report Writing Revolution

Let's move beyond emails for a moment and talk about reports. Those multi-page documents that executives skim and file and never think about again.

Most business reports are written backwards.

They start with background, move through methodology, present findings, and finally – on page seventeen – get to the point.

Flip it.

Start with your conclusion. Lead with your recommendation. Put the action items on page one, not page twenty.

Your readers are busy. They don't have time for your literary journey. They want to know what you discovered and what they should do about it.

Everything else is supporting evidence.

The Meeting Minutes Myth

Meeting minutes are not transcripts. They're not supposed to capture every word spoken or every tangent explored.

They're action documents.

Who's doing what by when? What decisions were made? What questions remain unanswered?

That's it.

I sit in meetings where people frantically try to capture every detail, as if the minutes are going to be used as evidence in some future tribunal. Meanwhile, the actual purpose of the meeting – to make decisions and assign actions – gets lost in the administrative theatre.

Focus on outcomes, not process.

The Power of Simple Words

I was reviewing a proposal last month where someone used the word "utilise" seventeen times. Seventeen! There's nothing wrong with "use." It's shorter, clearer, and doesn't make you sound like you're trying too hard.

This happens everywhere. "Facilitate" instead of "help." "Optimise" instead of "improve." "Leverage" instead of... well, almost anything else.

Big words don't make you sound smart. Clear communication makes you sound smart.

Some of the most effective business writing I've ever read uses predominantly single-syllable words. Not because the writers weren't sophisticated, but because they were confident enough in their ideas to express them simply.

The Deadline Dance

Every piece of workplace writing has a deadline. Most people treat this as a constraint.

It's actually a gift.

Deadlines force decisions. They prevent endless revision cycles. They create urgency that drives clarity.

Without deadlines, writing expands to fill available time. With tight deadlines, you focus on what matters most.

Some of my best writing has been produced under ridiculous time pressure. Not because pressure makes you a better writer, but because it makes you a more decisive editor.

The Feedback Loop

Here's something they don't teach in business communication courses: the best way to improve your writing is to ask for feedback on your communication effectiveness, not your writing quality.

Don't ask: "How's my grammar?" Ask: "Was my message clear?"

Don't ask: "Do you like my writing style?" Ask: "Did you understand what I needed from you?"

Don't ask: "Any comments on the report?" Ask: "What questions do you still have after reading this?"

The goal isn't beautiful writing. It's effective communication.

The Technology Trap

Spell-check is not your editor. Grammar software is not your writing coach. Auto-complete is not your communication strategy.

These tools can catch obvious errors, but they can't fix unclear thinking. They can't improve your structure. They can't make your message more persuasive or your tone more appropriate.

Rely on them for technical cleanup, not for communication strategy.

Making It Stick

The hardest part about improving workplace writing isn't learning new techniques. It's breaking old habits.

For thirty days, try this: before you send any written communication, ask yourself three questions:

1. What's the one thing I want them to do after reading this?
2. Can I say this in fewer words?
3. Would this make sense to someone who knows nothing about the context?

That's it. Three questions. Thirty days.

The improvement will be dramatic.

Because at the end of the day, effective workplace writing isn't about following rules or impressing people with your vocabulary. It's about moving things forward. Getting stuff done. Making progress happen.

And in my experience, the people who do that best are the ones who learned to communicate like human beings, not like corporate writing machines.

Your mileage may vary. But probably not by much.